Friday, August 8, 2014


In this battle between Amazon and Hachette, I'm siding with Amazon, not only because I'm a Montlake Romance author and a self-published author, but because I've been closely following (as much as possible) the information and discussions about this situation and feel Amazon is (for the most part) in the right. I'm very concerned about my colleagues who write for Hachette. They are truly the ones suffering because their publisher is using them as canon fodder. (Although many of them don't realize Hachette has thrust them into the front lines, and they are blaming Amazon for the war.)

Please don't throw the "Amazon is not your friend" comment at me. I already know that. Amazon is a business--one that has changed my life for the better. I'm deeply grateful to the company, but that doesn't mean I'm blindly on Amazon's side.

What I am against is paying high prices for ebooks. However the dust falls from the giants duking out the contract, I will NOT buy high priced ebooks. I don't care who publishes them or if they are written by my favorite authors. For me, it a matter of principle. I feel it's WRONG for publishers to charge a high price for an ebook, and that they are just trying to GOUGE the reader. Sometimes, it's really hard not to press that buy button on a book I really want. At those times, I feel resentment at the publisher who controls the pricing. But then I browse the Amazon or iBooks website and find something else to read--something affordable. There are always other books. :)

When I say "affordable" that's perhaps misleading. Thanks to Amazon, I'm in a position to afford to read whatever I want, regardless of the price. But I won't. Perhaps it's from too many years where I could never afford enough books. I out-read my types of books at the city and school library. I haunted used books stores and garage sales for paperback books I could buy for .25 or .50. Sometimes, it still feels like a luxury to go on an ebook "shopping spree" or pay a high price for a hardback book that only takes me a few hours to read.

There are a lot of people out there like me--avid readers who speed through books and can never have enough of their favorite type of stories. Many of those readers cannot afford to feed their habit--or they couldn't before so many free and low price ebooks came on the market--again due to Amazon.

There are many, many, many inexpensive books out there, and readers will buy them, find new authors to love and auto-buy, and drift away from old favorites whom they cannot afford (or don't want to afford.) Then both author and publisher will lose.

Debra Holland, Ph.D
New York Times and USA Today Bestselling Author

From: Kindle Direct Publishing
Subject: Important Kindle request
Date: August 8, 2014 at 10:12:34 PM PDT
To: Debra Holland

Dear KDP Author,

Just ahead of World War II, there was a radical invention that shook the foundations of book publishing. It was the paperback book. This was a time when movie tickets cost 10 or 20 cents, and books cost $2.50. The new paperback cost 25 cents – it was ten times cheaper. Readers loved the paperback and millions of copies were sold in just the first year.

With it being so inexpensive and with so many more people able to afford to buy and read books, you would think the literary establishment of the day would have celebrated the invention of the paperback, yes? Nope. Instead, they dug in and circled the wagons. They believed low cost paperbacks would destroy literary culture and harm the industry (not to mention their own bank accounts). Many bookstores refused to stock them, and the early paperback publishers had to use unconventional methods of distribution – places like newsstands and drugstores. The famous author George Orwell came out publicly and said about the new paperback format, if “publishers had any sense, they would combine against them and suppress them.” Yes, George Orwell was suggesting collusion.

Well… history doesn’t repeat itself, but it does rhyme.

Fast forward to today, and it’s the e-book’s turn to be opposed by the literary establishment. Amazon and Hachette – a big US publisher and part of a $10 billion media conglomerate – are in the middle of a business dispute about e-books. We want lower e-book prices. Hachette does not. Many e-books are being released at $14.99 and even $19.99. That is unjustifiably high for an e-book. With an e-book, there’s no printing, no over-printing, no need to forecast, no returns, no lost sales due to out of stock, no warehousing costs, no transportation costs, and there is no secondary market – e-books cannot be resold as used books. E-books can and should be less expensive.

Perhaps channeling Orwell’s decades old suggestion, Hachette has already been caught illegally colluding with its competitors to raise e-book prices. So far those parties have paid $166 million in penalties and restitution. Colluding with its competitors to raise prices wasn’t only illegal, it was also highly disrespectful to Hachette’s readers.

The fact is many established incumbents in the industry have taken the position that lower e-book prices will “devalue books” and hurt “Arts and Letters.” They’re wrong. Just as paperbacks did not destroy book culture despite being ten times cheaper, neither will e-books. On the contrary, paperbacks ended up rejuvenating the book industry and making it stronger. The same will happen with e-books.

Many inside the echo-chamber of the industry often draw the box too small. They think books only compete against books. But in reality, books compete against mobile games, television, movies, Facebook, blogs, free news sites and more. If we want a healthy reading culture, we have to work hard to be sure books actually are competitive against these other media types, and a big part of that is working hard to make books less expensive.

Moreover, e-books are highly price elastic. This means that when the price goes down, customers buy much more. We've quantified the price elasticity of e-books from repeated measurements across many titles. For every copy an e-book would sell at $14.99, it would sell 1.74 copies if priced at $9.99. So, for example, if customers would buy 100,000 copies of a particular e-book at $14.99, then customers would buy 174,000 copies of that same e-book at $9.99. Total revenue at $14.99 would be $1,499,000. Total revenue at $9.99 is $1,738,000. The important thing to note here is that the lower price is good for all parties involved: the customer is paying 33% less and the author is getting a royalty check 16% larger and being read by an audience that’s 74% larger. The pie is simply bigger.

But when a thing has been done a certain way for a long time, resisting change can be a reflexive instinct, and the powerful interests of the status quo are hard to move. It was never in George Orwell’s interest to suppress paperback books – he was wrong about that.

And despite what some would have you believe, authors are not united on this issue. When the Authors Guild recently wrote on this, they titled their post: “Amazon-Hachette Debate Yields Diverse Opinions Among Authors” (the comments to this post are worth a read).  A petition started by another group of authors and aimed at Hachette, titled “Stop Fighting Low Prices and Fair Wages,” garnered over 7,600 signatures.  And there are myriad articles and posts, by authors and readers alike, supporting us in our effort to keep prices low and build a healthy reading culture. Author David Gaughran’s recent interview is another piece worth reading.

We recognize that writers reasonably want to be left out of a dispute between large companies. Some have suggested that we “just talk.” We tried that. Hachette spent three months stonewalling and only grudgingly began to even acknowledge our concerns when we took action to reduce sales of their titles in our store. Since then Amazon has made three separate offers to Hachette to take authors out of the middle. We first suggested that we (Amazon and Hachette) jointly make author royalties whole during the term of the dispute. Then we suggested that authors receive 100% of all sales of their titles until this dispute is resolved. Then we suggested that we would return to normal business operations if Amazon and Hachette’s normal share of revenue went to a literacy charity. But Hachette, and their parent company Lagardere, have quickly and repeatedly dismissed these offers even though e-books represent 1% of their revenues and they could easily agree to do so. They believe they get leverage from keeping their authors in the middle.

We will never give up our fight for reasonable e-book prices. We know making books more affordable is good for book culture. We’d like your help. Please email Hachette and copy us.

Hachette CEO, Michael Pietsch:

Copy us at:

Please consider including these points:

- We have noted your illegal collusion. Please stop working so hard to overcharge for ebooks. They can and should be less expensive.
- Lowering e-book prices will help – not hurt – the reading culture, just like paperbacks did.
- Stop using your authors as leverage and accept one of Amazon’s offers to take them out of the middle.
- Especially if you’re an author yourself: Remind them that authors are not united on this issue.

Thanks for your support.

The Amazon Books Team

P.S. You can also find this letter at


  1. I'm with you on the cost! I borrow new hardbacks from the library and I would never pay $15 for an ebook.

  2. Such a rip-off, isn't it, Patricia! Thanks for commenting!

  3. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.